//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
In the third Essay, Mila Sohoni details how Trump v. CASA should not be read, warning that the Trump Administration's rhetoric around the decision improperly frames legitimate judicial deliberation as defiance and threatens to poison intrabranch dialogue within the Article III judiciary
14d
www.stanfordlawreview.org
In <em>CASA</em> You Missed It | Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review