//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
What was communicated by FHM and SVT was exactly what Cochrane stated in its peer-reviewed, published review. If a claim is printed, published, and still stands years later, on what basis can it possibly be described as ‘misinformation’?
4mo
Gunk Appreciator