The actual finding according to the reporting here is more a null result: can't tell one way or the other, can't definitively match. Good reporting might explain the reason. I think it's best to just assume the Daily Mail is subtly or unsubtly lying almost all the time.
This seems rather significant for the defense.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...
The bullet used to kill conservative commentator Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle suspected killer Tyler Robinson allegedly used in the assassination, his attorneys argue.
