//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
💻 PhD Student at @dh-fbk.bsky.social @mobs-fbk.bsky.social @land-fbk.bsky.social 🇮🇹 FBK, University of Trento 🇪🇺 @ellis.eu ☕ NLP, CSS and coffee https://nicolopenzo.github.io/
Nicolò Penzo









Loading...
Interested? Come by our Poster @ Poster Session (NLP) 1 on January 22nd, 12–2 PM, Hall 2! See you in Singapore! 🇸🇬 🧵9/9 @dh-fbk.bsky.social @land-fbk.bsky.social @mobs-fbk.bsky.social
For current LLMs, multi-party conversations (MPCs) potentially represent a clear distributional shift, since they are mostly tested and optimized for two-party (human–assistant) interactions. 🧵2/9
By constraining LLMs, we can generate MPCs that: 1) exhibit diverse interaction structures and 2) capture rich speaker–addressee relationships, including multi-addressee turns 🧵4/9
One way to address the lack of structural diversity in social media–derived MPCs is to synthesize multi-party conversations. 🧵3/9
Interactional analysis and qualitative evaluation further demonstrate that LLMs are suitable for synthesizing large-scale, diverse Written MPC datasets, which can be potentially used to fine-tune smaller models for tasks like next speaker or addressee prediction. 🧵8/9
We also propose a novel evaluation framework combining quantitative and qualitative metrics. Such metrics measure how well generated MPCs adhere to content and structural constraints and whether they capture the complexity of real-world multi-party interactions. 🧵6/9
In this paper, we propose synthetic MPC generation testing four different LLMs guided by explicit constraints. We explore two strategies: 1 - One-Long (OL): generate the entire conversation in one step 2 - Turn-by-Turn (TT): generate sequentially, one turn at a time 🧵5/9
Social media platforms typically enforce a one-to-one reply structure, ignoring implicit addressees and oversimplifying interaction dynamics. In natural conversations, turns are often directed to multiple participants, generating much richer structures. 🧵1/9
🎶One more “song”? Come see our poster next week at #AAAI2026 on our paper: 📣 “Don’t Stop the Multi-Party! On Generating Synthetic Written Multi-Party Conversations with Constraints” With @marcoguerini.bsky.social Bruno Lepri @gglavas.bsky.social @satonelli.bsky.social 🧵 arxiv.org/abs/2502.13592
We found that some LLMs (i.e., Llama3.1, Qwen2.5) can generate well-structured multi-party conversations that conform to constraints. Comparing generation strategies, Turn-by-Turn adheres more closely to constraints and also produces greater linguistic variability. 🧵7/9
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
5mo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo
Nicolò Penzo