//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Open Scholarship, Repetition Research, Research on Research; likes repetition, likes repetition https://replicationresearch.org/
Lukas Röseler
Loading...
@ascharpf.bsky.social about sport washing: "States that are being criticized for deficits in democracy or corruption are participating in the regulation of world football"
I’ve just published a #PreprintReview of “The Reproducibility Promotion Plan for Funders – A co-created set of recommendations to foster reproducible research practices” on @prereview.bsky.social prereview.org/reviews/2049...
What is next for our Replication Research journal? Together with members of the Replication Journal Federation and CODECHECK, we have submitted a proposal to @dfg.de that is currently under review. You can read it here: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... @r2journal.bsky.social #ReplicationResearch
12d
11d
11d
Authored by Lukas Röseler
prereview.org
PREreview of “The Reproducibility Promotion Plan for Funders – A co-created set of recommendations to foster reproducible research practices”
Lukas Röseler
Lukas Röseler
Lukas Röseler
*NEW* @rorinstitute.bsky.social Substack post: @lukaswallrich.bsky.social, @aufdroeseler.bsky.social & @josefinaw.bsky.social explain why they created a database to facilitate discovery of social & behavioural sciences replication studies. researchonresearchinstitute.substack.com/p/did-you-kn...
2d
Prereview provides an infrastructure to review preprints that is based on Zenodo. This way, your review does not belong to a single publisher who may keep it hidden forever but it becomes citable, versionized, open - like any parts of the scientific record should be.
Is there a dedicated place that lets researchers upload their reviews? PCI is only for reviews organized by PCI, Zenodo and OSF, Pubpeer are also for other things.