Dad, spouse, economist, cyclist, Lego maniac, long lapsed blogger (not necessarily in that order). Tend to prefer my 70 square miles to the surrounding reality.
Tom Bozzo
Loading...
Great piece, though I think Dems making pure partisan hay on inflation is preferable to short-term policy-ish reactions of the "we must do something, this is something..." variety that are thankless, stupid, and/or crowd out efforts to solve the more structural problems that Max rightly highlights.
We have no idea just how far behind the United States will be in 2028. We'll have nothing: no national science infrastructure, no agricultural progress, no medical progress.
The oligarch class has decided to hollow America out in a hedge fund takeover. We are being robbed of our future.
As you read about this abusive raid, remember that Georgia found that Elon Musk violated the rules on his mail-in ballot campaign in 2024 but the FBI has not raided him.
This is easy. The media in league with Republicans have successfully spread the narrative that the Democratic Party needs to move Right, that it's out of touch in some cultural way. Ask Dem voters what they really want, for themselves, & fully automated luxury gay space communism sounds kinda nice
Basically this⬇️ for questions #1 and #3, and for #2, most people want to believe they're ideologically aligned with the party they plan on supporting (and that their views are common sense).
As someone very strongly in favor of taking power *before* commencing the purges (among other things), I found myself nodding very vigorously along with basically all of what she has to say here.
despite what centrists would have you believe, the public’s notion of what “moderate” means is highly elastic. “moderate” is just a synonym for “reasonable” (which can and should include expropriating the fortunes of tycoons and relocating them to work camps).
"skepticism" is the wrong word folks. "Denialiam" is the word reporters use. Bloomberg has NO idea of whether or not Raymond really believed in global warming. What we know is that he denied it. News outlets should report what they know, not attempt mind reading.
Notably the first time I think I've seen a major presidential candidate (let's not be coy about that) mention expanding the House.
Most of the stories about Jay Clayton neglect to note that while he is regarded as a more serious person than Bill Pulte, like Pulte he also has ZERO intelligence or national security experience, which you'd think would be something relevant to mention
