//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Trade wonk, Brexit bore, globalisation defender, music lover, cricketer, gardener, supporter of mediocre football teams, who knows where the time goes?
David Henig






Loading...
Ok, so here's a big lesson to learn about the modern inter-connected economy. Putting in place barriers whether trade or more overt security ones is going to lead to higher inflation. Which your public doesn't want even if they claim to want to bring back manufacturing.
I'm interested to see a bunch of Labour MPs visiting Brussels continuing the tentative process of moving the party towards a more radical approach to UK-EU relations. I gather they were told (as I often am) that movement of people is the central question.
Improbable request, but if I know anyone in DC, I'm probably going to be there on a quick visit soon, so please let me know if we should meet!
"dime, con quien andas, dezirte he quien eres" (Tell me who you go with and and I'll tell you who you are). Sancho Panza to Don Quixote.
My central scenario is now that the Labour Party moves towards a policy of deeper ties with the EU *without red lines*. There is a possibility, maybe via some sort of commission, of going further towards membership. But suspect that will prove too much too soon.