//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
My favorite of the bugs it caught (we had a few of these!): {:error, reason} -> {:error, "Failed to do the thing: #{reason}"} ...where the compiler could prove that `reason` didn't implement the String.Chars protocol, and therefore the error handler would crash 100% of the time.
"I was introduced to “object oriented programming” when I was 18, and it took me until I was about 24 to realize it was all a load of horseshit" based blog post is based caseymuratori.com/blog_0015 (I know, I know. (g)old post. but still)
here's another tiny yet important puzzle piece for the history of computer science that's just been added - this interview: youtu.be/iqddnwKF8HQ
[about #twitter / #X]: "I think that posting on these website is becoming [...] kind of irrelevant"
If your evidence that an LLM has improved in some kind of skill is a published, widely available benchmark, I highly recommend not visiting psychics.