//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
The underlying legal landscape around court reform is so weird because the more radical solutions are actually much easier to pass than the more moderate ones
1d
Don Zeko
the worry is that they'll wiffle waffle themselves into supporting "term limits" which are both impossible (it's in the constitution) and wouldn't actually fix anything. so...I am pleased to see Buttigieg coming out explicitly for expanding the court, which is the thing we need to do.
1d
Noah Berlatsky
Changing/fixing/reforming the Court is simply going to be the consensus Dem position (perhaps with serious differences on how to do it) going into 2028, and this is as good evidence as any. (And I'm glad to see DC statehood moving up the priority list as well).
1d
Buttigieg: We sit in a in a country that's got the wrong number of people on the Supreme Court, possibly the wrong number of representatives in the House of Representatives. And by the way, when you consider the disenfranchisement of the people of DC, we have the wrong number of states in the US
1d
Video
Acyn
Jonathan Bernstein