Had Claude do a review of a draft paper and it referred to one problem as a "known kill-shot in peer review".
Well then, guess I better work on that.
On my way to #CPSA_ASPC26 and Toronto Union really is a beautiful train station.
If they would only finish that last bit of construction...
Again! Now I have to wait another five years for another chance.
A fun little update of the data from this book - this year possibly the highest number of floor-crossings ever (at least since 1990s)?
For non-Canadians: multiple floor crossings to the Liberal Party recently, which is on the edge of a majority.
LLM just said "I appreciate you being direct".
Are they getting passive aggressive now? It was bad enough when my printer started talking, not sure I can handle sass from my computer.
You're too busy and don't have time to do all the reviews?
Easy step one, stop reviewing for Elsevier journals.
Later you can also stop editing and submitting to them. (sorry to Electoral Studies, but this calls for market discipline, time to devalue those assets)
The last few years have really made it clear that people (including academics) basically only have substantive preferences, almost no procedural principles at all.
Majoritarianism? Sovereignty? Plain text of constitutions?
All completely flipped ideologically. Even among experts!
Everyone needs to relax about the canvas hack.
We all do that 2-factor authentication thing five times a day, so the data is safe now. Right?