This is very significant. Many of us operate with a simple argument:
1. AI on its own cannot generate anything original.
2. Apart from review articles academic journals only publish original work.
3. Therefore no AI generated paper should get through peer review.
Which premise is wrong?
Jo Wolff
We know of a man who was caught publishing dozens of AI-generated articles in academic journals. The journal that caught him pursued a ban not only from that journal but also from all journals by that publisher. This is a major crisis and it seems the consequences will be severe.
