//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Young Scientist Fellow, Institute for Basic Science CNIR @ Sungkyunkwan University Incoming Assistant Professor, CCC @ Vanderbilt University Prev. Yale & Dartmouth | Parent of a Very Good Dog | ericabusch.github.io
Erica Busch








Loading...
For motor/communication disorders, manifold-aligned interfaces could work for far more people. For mental health, incremental manifold-aware approaches may outperform blunter interventions. More broadly: understanding the natural structure of our minds may be key to improving them.
4h
When the mapping respected the manifold, people learned fast. When it didn't, learning stalled entirely — no improvement in the same amount of training time.
BCIs have been around for decades, but about 1/3 of users never gain control at all, regardless of practice. We think this struggle isn't a facet of effort, but a design problem: BCIs asked the brain to generate activity that's entirely unnatural & don't provide the support for improvement.
We designed three BCI mappings: one following the brain's most natural patterns, one using less dominant but still natural patterns, and one requiring patterns the brain doesn't naturally produce.
BCI learning changed the brain itself. Neural activity reorganized to align with the interface's goals & the degree of reorganization predicted individual differences in learning. Effects rippled beyond the targeted regions — suggesting BCI learning reshapes neural architecture more broadly.
Accordingly, the manifold determines both what people can learn and how fast. Our findings dovetail beautifully with work across species and recording methods, pointing to broad principles of how the brain learns. The manifold isn't just a neuroscience curiosity — it has real implications.
4h
4h
This project started in 2020 & shaped my PhD, so it's especially exciting to see it out. Massive thanks to my coauthors @glajoie.bsky.social & @krishnaswamylab.bsky.social & everyone who helped collect this massive dataset. news.yale.edu/2026/06/09/brain-computer-interface-works-not-against-brain
Erica Busch
4h
4h
4h
Brain activity doesn't wander randomly through high-D space. It travels along well-worn routes, forming a low-D structures or neural manifold. Using T-PHATE, which we developed previously (nature.com/articles/s43588-023-00419-0), we learned each person's individual manifold prior to BCI training.
Our new paper is out this week in Nature Neuroscience! www.nature.com/articles/s41... We built a BCI that works with the brain's natural geometry — and we found that people could learn to play a video game with their brains in <1 hr of training. This efficiency is groundbreaking & here's why:
4h
4h
4h
Erica Busch
Erica Busch
Erica Busch
Erica Busch
Erica Busch
Busch et al. use nonlinear neural manifolds to help humans gain rapid control over a noninvasive brain–computer interface, allowing them to learn how to play a video game with real-time fMRI neurofeed...
Human learning of noninvasive brain–computer interfaces via manifold geometry - Nature Neuroscience
www.nature.com
Erica Busch
Erica Busch
Erica Busch