//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
I'm not going to get into a back-and-forth on social media. It never goes anywhere. We have plenty of sources, close to the situation. Most decline to be revealed, for a variety of reasons. We have written many, many stories on the subject, and will continue to report.
1mo
Nick Daschel
Every piece you have done has been vibes. No meaningful relocation analysis, no sources, no discussion of what a fair deal should look like for taxpayers, no discussion of what leverage the city has. Tom Dundon even contradicted your reporting on how easy it would be for him to leave.
1mo
Edan Krolewicz
Sorry to ruin your day, but Bill is still our (and my) sports columnist. Maybe try to better understand what BIll is writing ... he's never said Dundon's goal is to leave. But it's a tool if he doesn't get what he wants. And that is very much up in the air.
1mo
Nick Daschel
Seems @billoram.bsky.social has been demoted by the Oregonian for his clickbait journalism. Here Tom Dundon contradicts everything Bill has been writing about for months (that Tom’s main goal is leaving, and that it would be easy to do so.) www.oregonlive.com/blazers/2026...
1mo
In a wide-ranging podcast interview, Dundon defended his controversial cost-cutting measures, discussed relocation, Chauncey Billups' arrest, getting a bad rap in the media and more.
www.oregonlive.com
Blazers owner Tom Dundon discusses relocation, cost-cutting measures, Billups’ arrest, more
Rip City Not Rip Off