//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...




Interestingly, the protective effect was much stronger in women than in men (for men, the effect is statistically insignificant). Future studies should investigate why!
What did we do? We used a natural experiment in Wales where shingles vaccine (Zostavax) eligibility was based on an birthdate cutoff, separating eligible and ineligible cohorts. This gave us a great RDD setting to causally estimate its effect on dementia risk.
Why do economists study this? This was a perfect setting for combining medical data and econometric methods! Policy evaluation of large public health intervention is rarely possible, but here was a unique chance to learn something causal about a vaccine policy at a large scale.
What do we find? Increase in vaccination uptake at the cutoff: - 0.01% vaccination for those just too old - 47.2% vaccination for those just young enough Receiving the vaccine reduced dementia risk by 3.5 percentage points (95% CI: 0.6 – 7.1, p=0.019), i.e. ~20%, over 7 years.
Our paper on the effect of herpes zoster vaccination on dementia is now out in Nature! πŸŽ‰ Huge thanks to Felix Michalik, Seunghun Chung, @pascalge.bsky.social and especially Min Xie (@minxiesci.bsky.social) & Simon Heß (@hesss.org) making the analysis so much fun! www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Apr 2, 2025
Apr 2, 2025
Apr 2, 2025
Apr 2, 2025
Apr 2, 2025