//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Associate Prof in cancer neuroscience at CSHL; amateur astrophotographer; views are mine alone https://www.cshl.edu/research/faculty-staff/jeremy-c-borniger/ 🇵🇸
Jeremy Borniger
Loading...
We commend Steven Kahn, MBChB, Aaron Kelly, PhD, Desmond Schatz, MD, Justin Ryder, PhD, and Irl Hirsch, MD for Standing Up for Science at the ADA meeting. They were forcibly removed by police for handing out the following editorial. diabetesjournals.org/care/article...
Iris nebula , 20 Hours LRGB #astrophotography
BREAKING: New proposed OMB regulation, applying to all federal grants, requiring grant reviews by senior political appointees and re-emphasizes that "peer review remains advisory and does not replace agency discretion". #standupforscience public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-10817.pdf
New Comment by Awsan Bahattab & colleagues—Transforming the humanitarian system: our role to confront embedded inequities 🔗 spkl.io/63328AhtJo
A triplet in Leo. #astrophotography
It’s begins today! meetings.cshl.edu/meetings.asp... @cshlnews.bsky.social
8d
10d
16d
17d
23d
1mo
It’s truly astonishing to see how comprehensively the US government is tearing down every part of the system that has made it up until now a world-leading power in science, research, and technological development. The entire world will suffer from this wanton destruction.
Wow. Thanks for alerting the community to this. This would be a total assassin peer review. There would be no transparency, so no accountability for funding decisions. Under these circumstances, we should all refuse to serve as reviewers.