Please note I assume there have not been many changes or additions to these resubmission given that they were already loved and got high impact evaluations - BUT if you substantially changed the application in between submissions please write that in the Notes..
If your grant does not have percentiles but only Impact Scores, please input those instead. All we need is a way to see how consistent/inconsistent these scores are, for the first time, unfortunately, for "funded" grants. Feel free to share the Google Doc link in other platforms or here.
All entries will be anonymous and only for aggregate analysis, share your name if you like, use an alias of some sort that you can later track and edit, if not. You can also message your scores to me. Whatever info you feel comfortable sharing. Also vent off, if you like! We all need it sometimes.
I thought we could gather them somewhere and see for ourselves the level of variability and "chance" factor in getting NIH funding. Three reviewers loved your grant, great (great if you got it funded, of course) ! Would another three like it the same way in the next cycle!
I hope NIH will properly gather these statistics and share at some point but not holding my breath for anytime soon. The idea is to look at the destiny of grants that would have been funded in normal years but did not in 2025. Now that most of us resubmitted them and are getting "new" scores
Let's have a reality check about NIH/science finding! We all know variability in grant reviews is real. BUT we DID NOT have a way to test what would happen to a "funded" grant if it was reviewed again. IF you had a grant that would have made it but did not (2025!) ➡️ docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
To accommodate decision timelines from RECOMB main conference and ISMB, we have now extended the submission deadline with RECOMB-RSG to March 13th, there will be no more extensions. Looking forward to have you join us in Greece!
recomb-rsg.github.io
Ferhat Ay
Ferhat Ay
2 PhD candidates in my group: Michal @malszycki.bsky.social and Lisa led this work. We are very thankful to Ay lab ( @ferhatay.bsky.social ) and Alev lab (ASHBi, Kyoto), who helped make our story more complete. This work was funded by @dfg.de in the framework of @spp2202.bsky.social
Ferhat Ay
Ferhat Ay
Ferhat Ay
Analysis of the evolution of this gene architecture and the presence of GC-rich isochores revealed that these features are specific to amniotes. By using the pA-RNA signal as a proxy for speckles we show the speckles are present in amniotes and absent in fish and invertebrates.
