Why did a reputable journal publish such a shoddy meta-analysis? Why did it rack up so many citations? Why did it get reported so widely?
I'd guess that the answers to these questions all stem from the US's neoliberal allergy to public goods. 1/🧵
arstechnica.com/ai/2026/05/i...
The retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times.
