//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Mostly stats, visualization, open science, and psychotherapy. https://rpsychologist.com
Kristoffer Magnusson
Loading...
No one:

 Absolutely no one: Billion-dollar publisher in 2026: “We published the wrong version so our only option is to issue a retraction under your name”
I hope this is satire, but considering everything we're seeing in research, this feels more like an ominous preview
We are not ready for the next generation of research misconduct. "Our proprietary AI robots independently recreate any open source project from scratch. The result? Legally distinct code with corporate-friendly licensing. No attribution. No copyleft." malus.sh
If only...
Methodologists' theoretical papers: "you MUST do X or your estimates are meaningless." Methodologists' empirical papers: [does not do X]
Someone must've done a systematic review on whether methodologists follow their own advice?