//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Reader in #YouthInvolvement and Health @herts.ac.uk. #PublicInvolvement #CYPHealthParticipation, qual & participatory research methods. She/her www.go.herts.ac.uk/loucamai_brady
Louca-Mai Brady









Loading...
Over 100 MPs have signed an early day motion to reject the EHRC's Code of Practice. If your MP hasn't signed yet, it takes two minutes to email and ask them to take action. equalrecognition.eaction.org.uk/rejectthecode
This is the wrong way of looking at it. Number of bids not necessarily going up due to AI but due to the tough financial crisis in higher education putting even more pressure on academics to get funding. Also if you want to get less AI in an application cut the nonsense & waffly tick boxing sections
"No black woman writer... can write "too much". Indeed, no woman writer can write "too much"...No woman has ever written enough" - bell hooks (1952- 2021) #WomensArt (Photo K.Levine).
A social media ban isn’t a quick fix. While risks are real, it overlooks the complexity of young people’s lives online. We need balanced, evidence-based solutions, that address causes, reduce harm, and support safe, positive digital experiences. Read our full response: cypmhc.org.uk/cypmhc-respo...
Also the complete absence of #participation and #YouthVoice in both the development of this policy & plans for its implementation. The fact that this is been developed by & will be imposed on young people by adults without any input from them is another big reason why it's unlikely to succeed.
One of the obvious problems with a under-16 social media ban is that it won't work. (60%+ of Australian under-16s are still using these platforms). But it will make people feel like something has been done so they won't tackle the content, which is the real issue.
If this goes ahead, it will be a policy without any precedent that I can think of. The evidence that social media is 'harmful' for under-16s simply isn't there. People have been looking for it! It's become a kind of common sense. But actual evidence that this is a problem doesn't really exist 🧵
if you are interested in involvement, policy and practice then this FREE to download article maybe of interest to you link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Are you Non-Binary and sick of being forced into explicitly gendered spaces? Trans, and want a way to avoid issues at work, or have a safety net in case you are in a hostile situation? We have an imperfect solution that could make your life easier: www.essehouse.co.uk/pee-in-peace-program
This would be a pointless and vindictive move which would shame those who propose it for the rest of their careers.