Political philosopher | IRC postdoctoral fellow at Trinity College Dublin | Animals, future generations, and democratic theory | Also, memes and shitposting.
https://sites.google.com/view/pablomagana
Pablo Magaña
Loading...
Dear reviewers,
If you say it's fine that a paper is about X, please don't suggest that it could be about Y. Yes, of course, it could be about Y, Z, etc. but it's about X (and you've said it's fine!). Just say "write about Y" if it shouldn't be about X in the first place.
Or, if you want to flag the potential relevance of Y, do it in a way that signals to editors that it is not essential (and may in fact be material for a further, independent paper!).
philevents.org/event/show/1... Next Thursday, June 18 at 1pm CET, Sven Neth (U. Pittsburgh) will present on longtermist myopia at the Moral Minds and Ethical Futures seminar series co-organized by @hugoviciana.bsky.social and me. Join us!!
I always appreciate artists who leave the top right-hand corner clear, in case people want to use their work as an OUP handbook cover and have the names be nicely legible
I don't know who put the fake eyes in there, but you made my day.
After spending an hour trying to remove em dashes from an accepted paper so people don't think I wrote it with AI, I've decided to keep (most of) them. This is absurd. I like em dashes. I think they add rhythm and a sense of flow, and AIs only use them because people frequently use them (!).
If insects are sentient and sentience implies rights, what follows for food security and public health? I call this the "insect challenge" for animal ethics. The Journal of Practical Ethics has a new symposium on it, with an article by me and 3 replies: journals.publishing.umich.edu/jpe/news/ 1/5
Remember that recent paper claiming to show that "ideological bias" determined the results obtained by immigration policy research teams?
A careful, open-code reanalysis by @kauspurg.bsky.social & Josef Brüderl finds that the result arises from a coding error. —> doi.org/10.31222/osf...
