Nouvelle vidéo ! On parle des progrès récents et fulgurant dans la recherche en maths par IA. Ça va très très vite.
youtu.be/AYPQIntoJeE
I think it is really worth reading this piece on RSI at Anthropic.
There is a bit of navel-gazing, some marketing, and a lot of very sincere beliefs about what Anthropic thinks is likely in the near future of AI that you probably want to be aware of. www.anthropic.com/institute/re...
Surprise surprise! It is WHAT is processed and not HOW or HOW MUCH it is processed that matters for health. This is EXACTLY the argument that Gabriel Rosenberg and I made in Feed the People! using many of these same studies.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
If leading AI companies are indeed approaching the point of recursive self-improvement, a coordinated, verifiable, and universally applied pause is probably the only responsible solution to mitigate several major AI risks; at least until safety guarantees are developed and demonstrated.
(1/2)
Arrêtez la bidoche.
C'est une catastrophe aussi bien éthique qu'écologique.
On peut se nourrir autrement. Ce n'est ni plus difficile ni plus coûteux (contrairement à ce qu'on entend souvent).
"Décarner" son alimentation est l'acte individuel le plus impactant sur le plan écologique (et politique).
Our progress toward recursive self-improvement, and its implications.
J'ai beaucoup apprécié mon récent passage à C dans lair pour discuter des risques de l'IA pour nos sociétés, nos économies, et nos démocraties. Merci Caroline Roux pour l'invitation!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNCu...
What do randomized controlled trials really tell us about the effects of ultraprocessed foods?
I’ve been writing a lot of long deep dives recently and wanted to step back and write a quick rant about why I’m consistently landing so hard in the skeptic corner in the data center debate
blog.andymasley.com/p/why-i-thin...
Apparently superhuman performance from the AI in answering questions about contract law in this paper, as judged by law professors compared to the answers of their peers
-Gemini 2.5 had a 75% win rate vs. professors
-Gemini's answers were rated LESS harmful than humans
-Newer models do even better
YouTube video by C dans l'air - France Télévisions
🥚 TOUTE LA SOUFFRANCE DANS UN OEUF
🔥 Nouvel épisode stratégie
Je reçois Keyvan Mostafavi, directeur d'Anima, pour parler de la souffrance des poules pondeuses
On soulève des questions épineuses : végétarisme, effets de substitution, mesure de la souffrance – des réflexions utiles pour le mouvement
I asked ChatGPT to make an XKCD-style “pain vs. duration” chart about when to see a doctor.
It came up with this.
Honestly… it might be closer to real humor than I expected
Claquemuraille
l'Humanité
Monsieur Phi
Anthropic urges ‘temporary pause’ on AI development to discuss risks
Andy Masley
www.theguardian.com
Announcement that ‘policymakers’ need to be convened by US firm viewed as marketing ploy by some experts
Anthropic has floated the idea of a worldwide “temporary pause” on AI development – and said it was going to convene “policymakers” to discuss the dangers of advanced AI – in its latest release touting the capabilities of its products.
In a long post on Thursday, Anthropic detailed the progress of its AI model, Claude, towards “recursive self improvement” – that is, being able to make better and more powerful versions of itself. Recursive self-improvement is a bugbear of AI safety researchers, viewed as the key step for AI to become superintelligent and therefore unleash widespread consequences on humanity. Continue reading...