//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Gemma Boleda, Marco Baroni, Thomas Brochhagen, Iria de Dios Flores | Computational Linguistics and Linguistic Theory Universitat Pompeu Fabra. upf.edu/web/colt Barcelona
Computational Linguistics @UPF









Loading...
Announcing our Trends in Language Evolution, Change, and Diversity workshop June 4th at UPF Poblenou! Featuring talks from Chiara Barbieri (Cagliari/Zürich), Gemma Boleda (ICREA/UPF), Karolina Grzech (UPF), Carmen Saldana (UB), Jamie D. Wright (Namur/Brussels) Sign up! www.upf.edu/web/colt/tre...
@ecesuurker.bsky.social presenting NeLLCom-Lex: A Neural-agent Framework to Study the Interplay between Lexical Systems and Language Use (Zhang et al, EMNLP Findings, 2025) !
LLMs as a synthesis between symbolic and distributed approaches to language (ACL Findings, 2025), a talk by Gemma Boleda @gboleda.bsky.social
Our group presented our work at Deep Learning BCN! Some highlights below. @dlbcnai.bsky.social
Amazing work by Jeanne Bruneau-Bongard, Emmanuel Chemla, and Thomas Brochhagen!
Many forces have been argued to shape natural language lexica, and there are different ways they can be operationalized and interact. We study which out of a set of forces and their interactions best fit cross-linguistic data. Now out in Cognitive Science: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Great work by Xixian Liao, Thomas Brochhagen, @gboleda.bsky.social and @laiamayol.bsky.social !
Do you use a pronoun more often when the entity you’re talking about is more predictable? Previous work offers diverging answers so we conducted a meta-analysis, combining data from 20 studies across 8 different languages. Now out in Language: muse.jhu.edu/article/969615
19d
5mo
5mo
5mo
6mo
6mo
8mo
8mo
Releasing v. 2.3 of ManyNames, an object naming dataset with 25K objects in real world images (English, plus partial coverage in Catalan and Mandarin Chinese). Check it out! amore-upf.github.io/manynames/ (New in this version: further data cleaning, speaker ID, more lexical info)
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
5mo
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
Computational Linguistics @UPF
www.upf.edu
TRENCADIS Workshop - COLT: Computational Linguistics and Linguistic Theory - UPF
Presenting this at #ICML with @rjantonello.bsky.social and Aditya Vaidya✨ Why do 𝙢𝙞𝙙𝙙𝙡𝙚 layers in LLMs and speech-audio models best predict brain responses to language? We show a peak in the dimensionality of 🤖 activations (left) to track high 🧠 predictivity (right) 🧵(cross-posted from X)
1mo
Gemma Boleda
Emily Cheng