//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
L.A. freelance writer/editor. Contributor, Gizmodo. Prev. The Verge, Jalopnik, others. Climate/energy, transportation, tech, TV. @zacestrada elsewhere. Signal: zacestrada.01 https://linktr.ee/zacestrada 🏳️‍🌈
Zac Estrada









Loading...
"Aren't you a tech reporter?" "Ish." "Ish?!" Kinda stopped listening after that tbh youtu.be/gM4LkaXwGuY?...
Add this to the giant pile of errors and misrepresentations made by the WaPo Editorial Board (which is completely separate from the newsroom) since its reboot.
It's only the end for Steyer talking about climate and the issues he wanted to push the state on if he wants it to be
What are "Things Not to Put on a Button" for $600?
Two stories, using broadly the same photo, explaining that Steyer hit that ceiling of support with a mostly effective climate message in a climate-sensitive state because not enough people bought the "Ok, so he's a billionaire, but" argument. And more were sick of his ads. Big miscalculation by him