//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...







(6/n) Done with a brilliant team: Hao Wu, Leon Klein, Stephan Gรผnnemann, and @franknoe.bsky.social .
7mo
Michael Plainer
Excited to share our latest preprint: ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—น๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—™๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜€: ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—™๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ-๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฝ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐——๐˜†๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ ๐ŸŽ‰
3mo
(7/n) Check out our paper and code: Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2506.17139 Code + models: github.com/noegroup/Sco... And also, our self-contained notebooks! Colab (JAX): colab.research.google.com/drive/1r3DGO... Colab (PyTorch): colab.research.google.com/drive/1rbcND... #NeurIPS2025 #Diffusion #MD
(3/n) The root issue is that at very small diffusion times, diffusion models are inaccurate. The loss is large, and the models violate the Fokker-Planck equation, meaning the evolution of the modelโ€™s density and its score disagree. When that happens, the recovered energy ๐‘ผ(x) is not meaningful.
7mo
(5/n) With this, we can run coarse-grained Langevin dynamics directly, without the need for any priors or force labels. This works across biomolecular systems including fast-folding proteins like Chignolin and BBA. Here is a comparison with and without our regularization:
(2/n) The problem: classical diffusion models learn scores that reproduce equilibrium samples, but the corresponding energy-based parameterization is not consistent. So if you try to use the learned energy to derive forces, the dynamics are wrong, even if the samples themselves look fine.
7mo
(4/n) Our solution: We train an energy-based diffusion model and regularize it to satisfy the Fokkerโ€“Planck equation. This enforces consistency between: - The density recovered via denoising - The potential energy learned at t = 0 Result: the same model can be used for sampling AND simulation.
(1/n) Can diffusion models simulate molecular dynamics instead of just generating independent samples? In our NeurIPS 2025 paper, we train energy-based diffusion models that can do both: - Generate independent samples - Learn the underlying potential ๐‘ผ ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2506.17139
7mo
7mo
Michael Plainer
7mo
7mo
Michael Plainer
Michael Plainer
Michael Plainer
Michael Plainer
Michael Plainer
Michael Plainer
Ever get tired of tiny timesteps bottlenecking your MD simulations? We show how to train a model for large-timestep Hamiltonian dynamics directly on standard MLFF datasets. ๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ needed! ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡
3mo
Video
Winfried Ripken