//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Rich eating, lefty. I'm correct about everything.
Boycott Society









Loading...
"whether you can prove fraud or not, it does undermine voter integrity" Not having fraud... Undermines voter integrity?
Curious if any scholarly work has been done on this phenomenon. My assumption is when things are real shit, finding small things to get angry about and actually get some change feels good. Taking back some control.
It's been obvious for decades at this point, but most people are not intellectually equipped to deal with the Internet, and especially public social media. There are thousands of blog/news sites, and they rely on SEO for their niche. The NYT doing this is different from an NFL targeted blog.
As Los Angeles has shown, it takes DAYS to count votes. Yet Platner has 90k before it's even midnight. Sounds fishy.