//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
neuroscience and behavior in parrots and songbirds Simons junior fellow and post-doc at NYU Langone studying vocal communication, PhD MIT brain and cognitive sciences
Andrew Bahle









Loading...
I think progress here requires a few things: 1) better conceptual clarity across the board and 2) large scale lab studies where we can monitor vocalizations and social interactions over months/yrs. This will allow for much more fine grained tests of our theories of animal communication.
1mo
Our piece on language-like properties in animal vocal behavior is available today. Check it out! This is an incredibly difficult and thorny topic which is nonetheless of supreme importance and interest imco (in my current opinion)
1mo
Is there ‘syntax’ in animal vocalizations? Maybe/it depends what you mean. In any case there sure are some complex long timescale dependencies that look rule-like! The bird song people are making a lot of progress on understanding how this structure arises.
Andrew Bahle
They are several distinctive statistical ‘laws’ which are present in human languages. Are these present in animals? Yes! but interpreting these findings however is not trivial. I think Inbal’s idea that learnability plays a key role may be in the right track.
We discuss a few features of language which may have analogs in animals vocalizations: statistical laws (zipf+), syntax (or at least complex sequencing) and reference and meaning (the ghosts of many dead philosophers haunt this one, but that’s because it so important!)
1mo
Finally the trickiest and the most interesting (again imco). Do animals mean things when they ‘talk’? I would say the answer is certainly yes. The question is how sophisticated are these meanings, and how widespread is this ability. Unassailable evidence is not easy to come by.
1mo
1mo
All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
authors.elsevier.com
Please wait whilst we redirect you
Andrew Bahle
1mo
Really excited to see this in print!
Two brain circuits. Same learning problem. Shared learning outcomes. Different dynamical implementations. Our work shows that learning is not a single canonical solution but can emerge through distinct population dynamics shaped by circuit architecture. Excited to share our latest preprint! 🧵1/12
Andrew Bahle
1mo
Andrew Bahle
Andrew Bahle
2d
Andrew Bahle
Where, exactly, does learning happen in the brain? Out today in @nature.com, we identify a synaptic locus of birdsong learning and show that the circuit can be tuned to make birds learn faster - but at a cost. Read on👇 #neuroskyence 🧪 #prattle 💬 #bioacoustics Shareable link: rdcu.be/fiyrS
29d
This Friday at McGill University, @loganjames.bsky.social and Maddie Cusimano will join researchers exploring computational approaches to animal communication at the symposium “Computational and Mechanistic Analyses of Communicative Interactions.” Register at: logansjames.github.io/events.html
15d
Combining a computational framework and optogenetic and chemogenetic manipulations within and downstream of the cortico-basal ganglia circuit identifies the specific cortico-basal ganglia synapse...
www.nature.com
A synaptic locus of song learning - Nature