//
sign in
Post
by @danabra.mov
PostEmbed
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @jimpick.com
Record
by @atsui.org
+ new component
Post
Caveats: - There are a bunch of different ways to slice subsidy numbers. - The scale of what China did and is doing is not very reproducible - Especially if you start further up the value chain (or with mittelstand path dependency on the combustion engine, for example) But, all in all: Yeppppp.
3d
'The real surprise from the OECD’s subsidy numbers is that it cost China less than $18bn in sectoral support over 15 years to build an industry that can now provide more clean power than the world can readily absorb.' @adamtooze.bsky.social @financialtimes.com www.ft.com/content/b6ca...
3d
Chris Hopkins
Clean power is within our reach — yet factories sit idle
www.ft.com
Wasting China’s solar panel surplus is madness
Thiago Carvalho