//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Senior analyst, Centre for Cities. All things urban economics - mainly labour markets, living standards, transport, and innovation. Fan of working with data and visualising it.
Rob Johnson



Loading...
Good chat tying in a lot of things swimming around in the political discourse recently: deprivation, growth, Manchesterism, NEETs... Hopefully an interesting listen as we try to make sense of it all in the context of our big cities!
If you missed our thoughts on last week's Milburn Review and what role cities have in tackling England's youth employment challenges, check out the thread below 👇
See our work two years ago (!) showing this for hybrid working in central London. Young workers are keenest to be in the office. They have most to learn from senior colleagues - who prefer being at home, but may not be appreciating the externalities... www.centreforcities.org/publication/...
Both have seen big reductions in deprivation. Focus in Manchester is on transport, while Liverpool have made strides in skills. But the underlying ingredients are the same: inclusion (through access to opportunities) and, crucially, underpinned by growth. It's the emphasis that differs.
8d
15d
18d
6d
Rob Johnson
Rob Johnson
Rob Johnson
Rob Johnson
Our quickfire thoughts on what the Milburn review means for cities and how the Govt should think about the opportunities for young people in its urban agenda. As an aside, refreshing to go through a 200+ page Review that is so incisive and well-written 🤯 Thread to follow 👇
🎙️Growth is back at the centre of politics. But who actually gets access to it? On the podcast, we discuss deprivation, youth worklessness and what cities need to do to turn growth into opportunity. Listen now 🎧👇
18d
8d
Do cities have to choose between growth and inclusion? Manchester and Liverpool suggest the answer is no. Different local strategies have helped reduce deprivation while supporting economic growth. Read more 👇 buff.ly/S0M36Wb
John Burn-Murdoch: ‘The rise of WFH has been a boon for thirtysomethings who are safely on the career conveyor belt. But it has hit the youngest workers twice: slowing their climb up the career ladder and keeping some out of the labour market entirely’ ft.trib.al/gMQAQTq
6d
Rob Johnson
18d
Manchester and Liverpool show how growth and inclusion can work together to reduce deprivation in cities.
buff.ly
Growth and inclusion aren’t trade-offs – just ask Manchester and Liverpool - Centre for Cities
Centre for Cities
Centre for Cities
More than one million young people are now not in education, employment or training. Our response to the Milburn Review argues that place matters, and that cities will be central to any long-term solution to the NEET challenge 👇 buff.ly/Jfhvfd3
18d
Financial Times
Young people, work, and cities: Reflections on the Milburn Review - Centre for Cities
How England’s rising NEET rates highlight the role of cities, devolution, skills, transport and housing in the Milburn Review.
buff.ly
Centre for Cities