//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...








Loading...
Rochefoucauld v Boustead creates an exception to s 53(1)(b). But held this does not apply in self-declaration cases; Rochefoucauld is limited in its application to trusts by transfer (i.e. cases where property is transferred to a trustee on the basis it should be held for the beneficiary).
8mo
Zacaroli LJ sticks to orthodox view that failure to comply with s53(1)(b) creates a valid, but unenforceable trust (and, as such, RSW is entitled to the land free of the trustee’s creditor’s claim).