//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Associate prof in plant ecology at Uppsala University, Sweden. Tropical forest dynamics, trait-based ecology, natural and anthropogenic disturbance...
Bob Muscarella









Loading...
Final note: Machine learning / AI approaches are being developed that may eventually help remove some of the barriers to this work. Regardless, good sample preparation and imaging is truly an art and worth the time spent! #Q-NET
3d
Bob Muscarella
But having higher power for addressing many questions (e.g., intraspecific variation) would require more intensive sampling. This should be explicitly considered when designing a sampling plan for wood anatomy research.
Since traits can spatially vary across a sample, it's not clear how many vessels (or how much area) should be measured to get a good estimate for a given trait value. What to do?!?
We also found that the proportional area of the sample measured better explained error rates than absolute area. So, when doing this kind of work, you might consider measuring larger areas for larger samples to get a good estimate rather than measuring a standard area across sections... 🤔
New paper on sampling for vessel traits in wood anatomical studies! A short 🧵... Wood anatomical traits can provide great info on ecophysiology, ecology, and evolution but it takes a lot of painstaking work to quantify them! academic.oup.com/aob/advance-... @juliavtavares.bsky.social
3d
Well, we had already measured ALL the vessels in a set of 164 samples across 19 species in Puerto Rico. So we thought "Let's use a digital subsampling approach to see how accuracy and precision of trait estimates varied with the proportional (and absolute area) sampled!"
3d
3d
3d
3d
So, we quantified the improvement of accuracy and precision of trait estimates relative to the "true value" (i.e., when ALL vessels were measured) with increasing proportional area sampled.
For example, quantifying vessel traits (e.g., vessel size, density), people typically collect thin cross sections and then work under a microscope to measure the features. But an individual cross section can have LOTS of vessels so people often measure a small fraction of these.
Last, we used variance partitioning to attribute variation in of various traits to across species, within species, and residual variation, with different proportional areas sampled. For broad comparisons across species, even fairly low sampling (~10% of section area) captured the main patterns.
Bob Muscarella
3d
Bob Muscarella
Bob Muscarella
Bob Muscarella
Bob Muscarella
3d
3d
Bob Muscarella
Bob Muscarella
[Side note: In this process, we developed an R package (qwar) to process wood anatomical annotations in R. It requires an .SVG file of annotations as input (we used #QuPath to do the annotations). The package is available albeit not very well documented yet... github.com/bobmuscarell... ]
Bob Muscarella
3d
Bob Muscarella