Supporting things because they are open is odd. Fund the practices that move science fastest. Open often wins on the merits, which is the whole point. I cannot rule out that there may have been some hot takes in this interview.
Casey Greene
“My interest isn't really open science; it's high-quality, rigorous science..often that happens to be open.”
Sense from @casey.greenelab.com
that aligns with how serious scientists see research and the idea it should be "open as possible, closed as necessary" www.springernature.com/gp/researche...
Professor Casey Greene shares his perspective on how open science practices enable better, more rigorous science that ultimately leads to “more
