//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
a guy with a poodle and a blog. philly sports fan. jew-ish. https://www.necessaryfictions.blog/
elias isquith
Loading...
I'll always say that Napoleon, while he had actual practical concerns and was not just a mad warmonger, had the fatal flaw that he simply could not make a peace that left his enemies feeling they weren't being destroyed or set up. By the by, listen to the Age of Napoleon podcast!
NYC Amazon Driver Fired Over Pro-Union Social Media Posts www.thecityreporter.nyc/2026/06/10/a...
(stares in Iran 2026)
Having come to the eventual conclusion that Napoleon was bad and Churchill was good, I'm calling this my most House of Lords-coded thread to date
47m
7h
1h
chat, assemble!
1h
perhaps your most masterful gambit yet, sir.