So many law review articles and he just tweeted it out
This administration is committing Watergate level crimes multiple times per week—and those are the ones we know about. It’s crazy to think about what else will come out after.
It’s absolutely essential these criminals are held responsible for their crimes. We must end elite impunity.
They started a war of choice for absolutely no reason, with no real strategy and no real preparation, and the end result will be a global situation that is, in every single way, worse than what it was when they started.
Trump's weaponization of "terrorism" hides the administration's own uses of terror and reveals the threat of arbitrary power. Sharing this op ed I wrote for ABC Religion & Ethics
www.abc.net.au/religion/jes...
The Trump administration’s expansive and misleading use of ‘terrorism’ is not just a problem of terminology: rather, it reveals the administration’s blatant disregard of, and even contempt for, extern...
The fact that a second strike like that in an armed conflict is definitely a war crime should not completely negate the fact that *there is no war* and ALL the strikes are cold-blooded murder. The whole chain of command are murderers.
Department of Defense Law of War Manual, Sec. 18.3.2.1 states the "requirement" to refuse illegal orders.
What’s its key example? Wait for it . . . It’s "orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."
I spoke with @NPR about the U.S. strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed at least 165 civilians:
"At every level, civilian protection has been deprioritized . . . A modern army has to fight according to the law, and the law requires that you protect civilians."
www.npr.org/2026/03/11/n...
'Dirty hands, savage enemies, and bad apples: A taxonomy of war crimes apologia' 🌎
New Review of International Studies article and video abstract by Neil Christopher Renic and Jessica Wolfendale co-authored with Christopher Elliott 🌟
Read and watch it here! 👉 https://ow.ly/WIKs50XAtge
