//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...
Physician and health economist at Penn. I study opportunity, hope, and health @oppforhealthlab.bsky.social. Personal website: https://sites.google.com/site/atheendar/
Atheendar Venkataramani








Loading...
2/ Also, the discussion on the other site is, for the most part, super interesting and I learned a lot. Is X wayyy better than this site for learning about new methods/papers, etc?
Help me rewrite my paper! Would you rather see: 1. Noisier (with mostly flat pretrends) in a standard TWFE with sample restrictions that follow history/theory 2. Flat pretrends + more precisely estimated coefs in Synthetic DID (Refs seem to be skeptical about 2. Baseline is hard bec noise for 1)
1/ Really impressed by @caitlinmyers.bsky.social's response to comments on her team's paper on iphones and fertility on the other site (www.nber.org/papers/w35310). It takes courage to take on big questions. And it takes equanimity to cut through the noise and strengthen the argument.
Sherry Glied and I have critiqued the recent analysis on the impact of Medicaid work requirements on poverty. It is linked here: : www.healthaffairs.org/content/fore... Unfortunately, Professors Mulligan and Bai who appear to have led the work get a failing grade on this one.