Juxtaposition of these two stories in my timeline seems highly ironic. If the UK can’t afford (or doesn’t want to) properly operate big facilities like Diamond which clearly support our industrial strategy, how can we even contemplate a multi billion share of a new particle accelerator?
There is absolutely no reason to transfer PPAN grants to EPSRC - especially right now, as the funding associated with any transfer would undoubtedly be at the planned reduced level and hence too low to sustain them properly. It would simply move the problem from one council to another within UKRI.
Fears over STFC cost-savings plan aired since September 2025.
Oversight body repeatedly raised concerns over “lack of transparency” with research community.
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...
I just sent this letter to the Science Minister and the CEO of UKRI concerning STFC's budgets
After particle physics and astronomy, STFC's large facilities are next at risk for cuts:
www.theguardian.com/education/20...
Back in your box, particle physicists and astronomers! Shut up and suck it up, because (a) STFC is a chronic financial basket case and needs to be sorted out and (b) UKRI is doing important work, and Ian Chapman needs support 🤷
open.substack.com/pub/profseri...
University physics heads warn Vallance of STFC cuts impact.
Cuts “inconsistent” with government plan for growth, says open letter urging science minister to act.
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...
Diamond Light Source and ISIS Neutron and Muon Source face cuts of up to 20% as Science and Technology Facilities Council seeks savings
What is the "Drayson Partition", why was it created, and what was it guaranteeing?
👉@johnwomersley.bsky.social makes it clear to UKRI and STFC after they seem to have abandoned it.
⏪In case you missed it: particle physics, astronomy, and nuclear physics research are facing huge cuts in the UK...
