//
sign in
Profile
by @danabra.mov
Profile
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
Profile
by @jimpick.com
AviHandle
by @danabra.mov
AviHandle
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
AviHandle
by @katherine.computer
EventsList
by @katherine.computer
ProfileHeader
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileHeader
by @danabra.mov
ProfileMedia
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePlays
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @danabra.mov
ProfilePosts
by @dansshadow.bsky.social
ProfileReplies
by @danabra.mov
Record
by @atsui.org
Skircle
by @danabra.mov
StreamPlacePlaylist
by @katherine.computer
+ new component
Profile
Loading...









Loading...
Postdoctoral researcher at Université de Montréal 🇦🇷 →🇫🇷→🇱🇺→🇨🇦(⚜️) Pol Econ → Data Science → Science of Science (he/him/él/lui)
Diego Kozlowski
10/ 🔍 TL;DR Citation behaviour isn’t a meritocracy. It’s shaped by social ties and topic overlap. Let’s rethink how we evaluate research impact. 📚 Full paper → journals.plos.org/plosone/arti... #Bibliometrics #ScienceOfScience #ResearchPolicy
New preprint out: "Keyword Newspeak: Trump’s Orwellian Censorship of DEI in Science" osf.io/wkvs5_v1 We examine the presence of flagged keywords in NSF-funded research from 1988 to 2024. w/ @caropradier.bsky.social, É. Marteau, @diegokoz.bsky.social, @lucyces.bsky.social, @lariviev.bsky.social
My first preprint is out! Gender parity in autism research: A bibliometric review. 🌐 doi.org/10.31219/osf... 👥 We worked together on this, with @diegokoz.bsky.social , Audrey Gan-Ganowicz and @lariviev.bsky.social! #Autismresearch #Bibliometrics #GenderParity Details in comments👇
6/ 💡 Implication: Citation counts don’t just reflect “impact” — they reflect who you know and what you study. Evaluating research solely through citations can reinforce inequalities.
5/ So what does this mean? Most citations come from proximity — social and intellectual.
7mo
7/ 🧩 Caveat: We studied U.S. economics. Patterns may differ elsewhere, but the same forces appear across many fields — though with different strengths.
3/ Main result: Papers are much more likely to cite others by people they’re socially close to (coauthors or collaborators-of-collaborators).
🧵 1/ 🚨 New paper out in PLOS ONE! w/ @caropradier.bsky.social @benzpierre.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social @ipoga.bsky.social @lariviev.bsky.social We studied 43k authors and 264k citation links in U.S. economics to ask: 👉 Why do some papers cite others? 🔗 journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
Apr 22, 2025
4/ 🧠 Semantic similarity also matters! If two papers talk about similar topics, they’re more likely to cite each other. 🌟 Prestige? Less powerful than expected. Citations have an effect only when they’re far from your social or topic network.
Mar 13, 2025
2/ We examined three main factors behind citations: 👥 Social proximity (are authors connected?) 🧠 Semantic similarity (are papers about the same thing?) 🌟 Prestige (is the author already well-known?)
7mo
7mo
7mo
7mo
7mo
7mo
7mo
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski
Natsu Sh.
Diego Kozlowski
Jade Maria Moisan